« Days of '36, 1972 | Main | La Vie de morts, 1991 »

December 15, 2005

Nathalie Granger, 1972

nathalie_granger.gifIt would seem logical to characterize Marguerite Duras' organic, elliptical anti-melodrama Nathalie Granger as a precursor of sorts to the implosive isolation and domestic violence of Chantal Akerman's Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles. Both films depict a silent ritualism to the performance of domestic chores through stationary shots and disembodied framing, and intimated acts of violence that surface within the perturbation of these rituals (in Duras' film, the stoking of a bonfire in the backyard and the tearing of contractual papers that are then thrown into the burning fireplace correlate to Jeanne Dielman's disorientation after accidentally burning potatoes on the stovetop). An early sequence of a radio news broadcast playing in the background that chronicles the manhunt for a pair of escaped convicts similarly establishes a sense of disquiet and foreboding in the quotidian ritual, as the two women, Isabelle Granger (Lucia Bosé) and an unnamed (and perhaps representationally identified) "other woman" (Jeanne Moreau) clear the breakfast table, wash dishes, and replace the dinnerware into the cupboards in silence. However, a subsequent telephone call to local authorities - an inquiry into the immigration status of their unexpectedly deported housekeeper - suggests that, unlike Jeanne Dielman who performs her tasks with a seemingly catatonic disarticulation from reality, their actions are borne of ennui, a self-created distraction to fill the empty hours of their domestic prison (note the repeated image of the window bars that overlook the street, a theme that is also aurally represented by the recurring sound of the radio broadcast on the escaped prisoners as well as the variations of a set of rudimentary notes played on a piano). Meanwhile, another domestic crisis plays out in the background as Isabelle petitions to get her young daughter Nathalie (Valerie Mascolo), already on the verge of expulsion for a pattern of misbehavior in school, admitted into another school in the resolute (if not over-magnified) belief that her daughter's entire life prospect would somehow be irrevocably "finished" if she cannot gain admission and continue with her piano lessons. A final dynamic is added in the comical appearance of an ineffective door-to-door washing machine salesman (Gérard Depardieu) who misconstrues the women's bored indifference as an open invitation to continue to insinuate himself into their company. In creating a tone of languid texturality, Nathalie Granger can also be seen a prefiguration to the cinema of Claire Denis, a visual convergence that is particularly evident in the tracking shot of Isabelle's reflection in a pond that is reversed (and figuratively wiped away) in the subsequent match cut to Nathalie's playmate, Laurence (Nathalie Bourgeois) trawling plankton as the rowboat slowly drifts away from the camera. This countervalent intertextuality of entropy and inertia, melody and dissonance, physical presence and mirror image (a metaphoric device that is also incorporated in Duras' subsequent film, India Song) inevitably define the idiosyncratic affectation of the women in the Granger household - the internalized psychological warfare and violent revolution between identity and erasure.

Posted by acquarello on Dec 15, 2005 | | Filed under 2005, Marguerite Duras


can you tell me where I can buy the movie India song?

Posted by: speetjens mickey on Jan 12, 2006 8:26 AM | Permalink

You can try Fnac (no English subs). CD Japan apparently sold it briefly but it's out of print now. I don't have either so I don't know anything about quality or availability.

Posted by: acquarello on Jan 12, 2006 9:34 AM | Permalink

I didn't see this one, your critique makes it real interesting.
Duras is a one of these obscur/inaccessible auteur I want to discover.
Did you see Le Navire Night (staring the gorgeous Dominique Sanda)? This one left me perplexed...

Posted by: HarryTuttle on Jan 13, 2006 11:46 AM | Permalink

Just saw Le Camion, another anti-film made in the same fashion as Le Navire Night, with a narration of what we should see (in this case the scenario read out loud by Duras and Depardieu) while the screen shows something else (industrial suburbia instead of the sea, without actors).

I wonder if Nathalie Granger is like this or if there is something of an actual acting?

Posted by: HarryTuttle on Jan 25, 2006 8:03 AM | Permalink

I haven't seen Le Navire Night, but I have seen Le Camion and structurally, Nathalie Granger is more straightforward. There is some dissociation between image and sound with the radio broadcasts that accompany the two women doing housework, but the scenario does unfold more conventionally as far as dialogue accompanying the actor's performance. The story/premise still plays out quite elliptically though and the acting is deadpan, but it's more logical in terms of when flashbacks are introduced and when the film cuts back to the original story.

Posted by: acquarello on Jan 25, 2006 10:47 AM | Permalink

Thanks for the help. I guess Le Navire Night comes midway then. There is the deadpan acting (actually the actors are sitting motionlessly throughout) and some extraneous "making of" deconstruction like in Le Camion, as we see the krieglight and the making up of the actors, while a narrator tells a fantasized story that might or might not have happened.
This style of filmmaking is so experimental I have hard time to warp my head around it. What does it mean? What does it say about filmmaking? I don't know.

Posted by: HarryTuttle on Jan 26, 2006 6:13 AM | Permalink

Post a comment:

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)