Krug vtoroj, 1990
[The Second Circle]
A solitary figure trudges through the inclement weather of a vast,
remote Siberian wilderness. An unyielding gust of wind brings the
young man (Pyotr Aleksandrov) to his knees as he attempts to avert
the caustic, sustained force of the snowstorm, momentarily obscuring
him from view, erased from the harsh and desolate landscape. The stark,
monochromatic image of the film then cuts to an ironically appropriate
impersonal and nondescript official title sequence, as the premature
sound of a knock on a door seemingly intrudes on the necessity to
present information on the film's certification. It is a subtle
reminder of life's evolving process: the intrusive nature and
unexpected inevitability of death. The film reopens to a jarring,
oddly lit image of the gaunt young man standing by the foot of his
father's bed in a cramped and squalid apartment. The dispatched medical
technicians dispassionately confirm his father's death from natural
causes, but explain that they cannot issue a death certificate, pragmatically
remarking "You should have placed him in a hospital. Everything
would have been easier then." Left alone in the apartment, the
son compassionately observes his father's inanimate countenance before
preparing his father's body for burial: selecting his best suit, bathing
him in the snow in the absence of running water in the apartment,
transporting his father's body to the outpatient clinic for a death
certificate examination. Without knowing the actual cause of death,
the doctor suggests a beaurocratically expedient determination of
cancer, rationalizing that "now everything is considered cancer."
Having been issued a death certificate, the son then meets with the
undertaker (Nadezhda Rodnova), an abrasive and insensitive businesswoman
who is quick to assess the family's limited means and treats the overwhelmed
young man with disrespect and open hostility, especially as the financially
strapped son begins to question some ancillary costs included in the
itemized funeral bill. As the dutiful son continues to encounter emotional
isolation, antipathy, and an impersonal commodification of the burial
process, can he restore the sanctity of the ritual and retain the
dignity of his beloved father's memory?
Aleksandr Sokurov creates a haunting, austere, and emotionally honest
examination of death, bereavement, and loneliness in The
Second Circle. The title of the film refers to the second
circle of hell depicted in The Divine
Comedy, Volume I: Inferno by Dante Alighieri, the realm of
damnation where the souls (of the lustful) are punished by the eternal
lashing of a raging, infernal storm (note the referential parallel
imagery of the opening blizzard scene). Using high contrast, raw,
monochromatic imagery, and spare, but deliberate use of close-up shots,
Sokurov reflects the soul's innate longing for compassion, human decency,
and spiritual communion in an increasingly amoral, apathetic, and
materialistic society: the atypical rapid intercutting of medium and
long shots as the son washes his father's body in the snow; the innocent
reassurance of the doctor's young son, Seyozha, who attempts to comfort
him by saying "everything's going to be all right"; the
chaotic and near violent bus ride that results in theft; the extended
shot of the son's long, melancholic gaze after opening his father's
eyes for a final glimpse. In the end, the doctor's parting words,
"the most terrible thing has been left behind" echoes the
resigned sentiment of the epilogue verse "Lucky are the nearest
and dearest of ours who died before us" - a prophetic observation
of the painful and isolating process of grief, longing, and survival.
©
Acquarello 2002. All rights reserved.
| DVD | Home
| Top |