Buta to gunkan, 1961
[Pigs and Battleships/The Flesh is Hot]
A rousing Star Spangled Banner-themed overture accompanies
the impressive sight of modern buildings lining the industrial landscape
of a postwar Japanese port town in a seeming celebration of the scale of
reconstruction achieved under American occupation. The idyllic image of
progress through cooperative international unity would, however, be immediately
subverted with a perspective shift to a crane shot, bird’s-eye view
of the neighboring area to reveal the rundown, bustling alleys of the red
light district in the periphery, an area conspicuously teeming with carousing,
animated American sailors on shore leave. Using an arsenal of underhanded
tactics ranging from aggressive solicitation to distractive, leading chases
through labyrinthine alleys, low-level gangsters lure the all-too willing
sailors into packed, mob-operated brothels operating from the back rooms of
legitimate businesses under the knowing watch of corrupt, shore patrol
officers. Among these hired patron corralers is a cocky young man named Kinta
(Hiroyuki Nagato) who, as the film begins, proudly boasts to his devoted
girlfriend, Haruko (Jitsuko Yoshimura) that he has been handpicked by the
yakuza boss for an integral position as (appropriately) piggery chief in the
syndicate’s new venture of selling livestock on the black market in a
convoluted financial arrangement that involves funneling capital from periodic
coercion of small shop owners to contribute to euphemistic “charity”
collection drives in order to buy food scraps from US battleships to breed
fatter pigs. The ecologically perverted food supply chain serves as an
implicitly metaphoric view of everyday life under occupied Japan as poor,
but hardworking people like Haruko find themselves increasingly marginalized
under the crushing weight of lawless, violent thugs seeking to get rich from
the economic chaos of a fledgling democracy, or prostituted by their own
families to curry favor from the Americans. Chronicled from the perspective
of the young couple as they struggle to build a life together, the film
reveals the innate, hollow myth of the Japanese postwar modernization model
under occupied reconstruction - a deceptive and figuratively aborted bright
future illuminated by the gaudy signs of a dystopian, false paradise.
Based on the novel by Kazu Otsuka, Pigs
and Battleships is a wry, acerbically blunt, provocative, and
irreverent satire on exploitation, greed, instinctuality, lawlessness,
and imposition of cultural identity. From the establishing crane shot of
the port town that reduces its inhabitants into near-imperceptible,
animated dots (in a miniaturized, behaviorally entomological perspective
of humanity that the filmmaker subsequently revisits in The Insect Woman),
Shohei Imamura creates a caricatured and hyperbolic, yet intrinsically
incisive allegory for the turbulent cultural conditions of occupied Japan
as the nation’s fragile and uncertain path towards democratization
becomes increasingly supplanted by exploitive opportunism and economic
anarchy, and the inevitable tide of modernization and globalism (through
Westernization) are reduced into ideologically detached pop culture
imitation and crass consumerism (note Kinta’s stereotypical
American wardrobe that consists of a varsity jacket, baseball cap,
and aviator sunglasses, an implicit reflection of his behavioral
pattern of imitative conformity). Visually, Imamura reflects the
country’s pervasive sentiment of rootlessness and absence
of direction through episodic cross-cutting between parallel
storylines, fragmented narrative, and off-axis camera angles, often
positioned near waist level (a reflection of Imamura’s
familiar theme of instinctual human sexuality) or at ceiling height
to reflect the characters’ basality. Note Imamura’s
implementation of a dizzied, rotating crane shot to depict Haruko’s
violation at the hands of a trio of drunken sailors that reinforces
the upended - and increasingly estranged - role of the Allied forces
as both military conquerors and humanitarian reconstructionists of a
ravaged nation. It is this increasingly nebulous and irreconcilable
duplicity that inevitably underlies the tragic social dichotomy that
the lovers’ represent: a displaced idealism borne of cultural
alienation, empty surrogate values, and elusive (and indefinable) human desire.
© Acquarello 2005. All rights reserved.
| Home | Top |